Voting Question: Why Won't The Wikipedia Allow Evidence or Proof That Randi's "Challenge" Is Bogus?

I've tried and I know that others did too, but the Wikipedia people won't allow anyone to submit any proof that the Randi "Million Dollar Challenge" is as real as a three dollar bill. Why? Aren't these reference sources are supposed to be unbiased, neutral, and more importantly, honest? There are many articles and reports that indicate that the challenge is as bogus a $3.00 bill. But that is immaterial: if Wikipedia was a non-biased information source it should publish those claims made by others that the test is at least controversial just in the name of fairness but it doesn't. Look at the Randi article: does it say anywhere that many people have tried to take the test and were rejected? That several researchers doubt the challenge? No; it makes it look like Randi is a saint, that butter wouldn't melt in his mouth, and nobody has ever had any objections. And if anyone thinks the challenge is real, try and take it sometime. See how far you get with that. @ To the sysop, I submitted the articles twice and each time some BS. Not just me, but others as well. Is Randi paying you people?