Quantcast
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4485

Open Question: Why is Wilkipedia so inconsistent with mentioning people's relationships and religious affiliation, etc?

Why is it some celebrities or famous people have things like a political leanings, religious affiliation, relationships, divorces, etc. and others omit such things? Why is there at least not some basic standard. One's religious affiliation, if known OR the fact there is a clean NON-BELIEF expressed is very personal. But it's no more or less personal that who one is or was "seeing" or one's political leanings. I just don't get why there are not some basics in place rather than it be an anything goes tool. It can be very useful since it is often updated and stays current.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4485

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>